Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"? - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"?
link : Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"?

Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"?

It bothered me, but lets talk about it. Here's the context, on "Meet the Press" today (and pushing his new book "Conscience of a Conservative: A Rejection of Destructive Politics and a Return to Principle"). From the transcript:

SEN. JEFF FLAKE: I think today conservatism has kind of been compromised by populism... So I think that just because we have the House, the Senate and the White House, we can’t rest easy and say that populism is a governing philosophy because I don’t believe that it is....

CHUCK TODD: Well, let me ask you this, what would you -- going in hindsight now -- what should the conservative movement have done in 2016 that they didn’t do?...

SEN. JEFF FLAKE: Well, I’m not denying that populism isn’t popular. That’s why it’s called populism. The problem is I think it’s first and foremost the duty of conservatives to tell the truth to the constituency and it’s easy to point to a shuttered factory and say, “Hey, if we’d just negotiated better trade deals, then those jobs would be there.” When really it’s automation and productivity gains. It’s much more complex and my concern is that populism is a sugar high and once you come off it, it’s particularly troublesome for the party. And so I wish that we would have been more truthful with the electorate in terms of what we can and what we cannot do in Washington....

The dictionary definition of "populism" is "The policies or principles of any of various political parties which seek to represent the interests of ordinary people." That's from the OED, which gives, as one of its examples, this sentence from Time Magazine from 1972:

Populism is a label that covers disparate policies and passions: among many others, New Deal reforms, consumer rage against business, ethnic belligerence.

I'm concerned about the expressions of contempt for ordinary people and democracy. I can see saying we need more structured principles and sane practicality, but it feels disrespectful to say "populism is a sugar high."

Thus Article Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"?

That's an article Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Does Senator Jeff Flake disrespect the people when he calls populism "a sugar high"? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2017/08/does-senator-jeff-flake-disrespect.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: