BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW
link : BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW

BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW

Here it comes:

Barrasso Requests CBO Score on Sanders’ Single-Payer Health Care Bill

Today, U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) called on the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to provide a full cost estimate of Senator Bernie Sanders’ (D-VT) single-payer health care bill, S. 1804.

In a letter to CBO Director Keith Hall, Barrasso highlights how Senator Sanders’ bill is not only a government takeover of health care, but would also put financial burdens on the American people.

“It is being sold as a new health system paid for completely by the government, with no restrictions and at no cost to the patient. Of course, such a system would be anything but free for the American taxpayer... As the country engages in a serious debate about how best to reform our health care system, it is imperative that the public understand the cost of Senator Sanders’ Medicare-for-All proposal,” wrote Barrasso.

This morning, the Republican Party tweeted this:

Where does Bernie think the $32 TRILLION to pay for single-payer health care is coming from?

— GOP (@GOP) September 13, 2017

That number appeared in a Washington Post editorial a couple of months ago:

... the government’s price tag would be astonishing. When Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) proposed a “Medicare for all” health plan in his presidential campaign, the nonpartisan Urban Institute figured that it would raise government spending by $32 trillion over 10 years, requiring a tax increase so huge that even the democratic socialist Mr. Sanders did not propose anything close to it.

Can Sanders rebut this? Can Democrats? We didn't have to find out in 2016 -- but if Sanders had won the Democratic presidential nomination, we would have found out.

Polls showed that Sanders had a double-digit lead over Donald Trump in 2016, and a lot of people think that's all you need to know to decide who should have been the Democrats' nominee. But we never heard any of the GOP's attacks on Sanders in 2016. As I've said before, I think a lot of them would have fallen flat. (He honeymooned in the Soviet Union? No voter under the age of 40 ever lived as an adult in a world that contained the Soviet Union.) This? I don't know. I don't know how good proponents will be in single payer/MfA's defense.

We'll see more attacks like this in 2018, and we'll find out how voters react to them. If they cut into support for single payer or Medicare for All, and if they hurt Democratic candidates in 2018, then we'll know that we can't assume Sanders would have coasted.

Thus Article BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW

That's an article BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article BERNIE WOULD'VE WON ... IF HE COULD'VE WITHSTOOD MONTHS OF WHAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE NOW with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2017/09/bernie-wouldve-won-if-he-couldve.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: