Title : "Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?"
link : "Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?"
"Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?"
Asks Glenn Greenwald (at Intercept).It’s a claim about nefarious Russian control. So it’s instantly vested with credibility and authority, published by leading news outlets, and then blindly accepted as fact in most elite circles....
The evidentiary threshold which an assertion must overcome before being accepted is so low as to be non-existent. And the penalty for desiring to see evidence for official claims, or questioning the validity and persuasiveness of the evidence that is proffered, are accusations that impugn one’s patriotism and loyalty (simply wanting to see evidence for official claims about Russia is proof, in many quarters, that one is a Kremlin agent or at least adores Putin – just as wanting to see evidence in 2002, or questioning the evidence presented for claims about Saddam, was viewed as proof that one harbored sympathy for the Iraqi dictator)....
Thus Article "Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?"
That's an article "Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?" This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article "Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?" with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2017/09/yet-another-major-russia-story-falls.html
0 Response to ""Yet Another Major Russia Story Falls Apart. Is Skepticism Permissible Yet?""
Post a Comment