Title : Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this?
link : Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this?
Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this?
To the 53 people who've watched A Christmas Prince every day for the past 18 days: Who hurt you?— Netflix US (@netflix) December 11, 2017
I wouldn't assume Netflix is using actual information about its customers. It's just a jaunty reminder that you can get Christmas movies on Netflix, using the trope that Netflix — like Santa Claus — sees what you're doing and judges you.
And it worked really well. Look at all the re-tweets. And it got the Washington Post to write an article, "What to know about ‘A Christmas Prince,’ the Netflix movie that sparked a controversy."
The response [to the tweet] was massive (retweeted about 110,000 times so far) and alternated between amused and scornful: Wow, Netflix, way to shame your own viewers for watching a movie that you commissioned and featured and promoted on your streaming service. Also, it’s a creepy reminder that this company has access to loads of personal data about all of your viewing habits, and probably has drawn some other intriguing conclusions. And it might tweet about them.I don't need to know anything about "A Christmas Prince," so I go back to the thing that pointed me to this "kerfuffle" in the first place, a humor riff — linked at Instapundit — "The Sad People Who Watched ‘A Christmas Prince’ 18 Days In A Row Craft A Statement/We've done nothing wrong. But we do need to lay down a marker that watching a good, clean holiday romance every single day of the Christmas season is just good, clean fun" by Mary Kathrine Ham. Sample:
Anyway, the “creepy tweet” kerfuffle has been in the news this week, so for those of you who are confused about this thing called “A Christmas Prince” that sparked such a controversy, here’s everything you need to know about the movie. Spoilers abound.
Lindsay: What’s the implication, here, that we’re all lonely cat ladies just because we want to watch a spunky reporter investigate a playboy prince and get herself entangled in some truly royal trouble a couple dozen times??Oh! Cats again. Time to reread "Cat Person" for the 3rd going on 18th day in a row:
Martin: I am not a girl or a lady, cat or otherwise. I know I’m outnumbered, here, but really....
Angelica: We do have a lot of cats, to be honest....
She learned that Robert had two cats, named Mu and Yan, and together they invented a complicated scenario in which her childhood cat, Pita, would send flirtatious texts to Yan, but whenever Pita talked to Mu she was formal and cold, because she was jealous of Mu’s relationship with Yan....Cats take on so much of the blame for what's wrong with us humans. That is, we project our shame onto cats. The cats don't care.
Before he got out of the car, he said, darkly, like a warning, “Just so you know, I have cats.”
“I know,” she said. “We texted about them, remember?”
More importantly, what would cats watch on Netflix 18 days in a row?
Thus Article Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this?
That's an article Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2017/12/should-netflix-be-shamingmockingstalkin.html
0 Response to "Should Netflix be shaming/mocking/stalking its own customers like this?"
Post a Comment