"The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."
link : "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."

"The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."

"There are plenty of problems with the NFL right now, but many of them are either intractable or downright unfixable. The catch rule is not one of them. The NFL has to fix it, and that might require a totally radical sort of solution. Let's make arguments for three very different types of changes to the much-hated catch rule...."

From "Three options to fix the NFL's catch rule" (ESPN), about this play in last nights Patriots/Steelers game.

ADDED: I guess if I've got a post with the words "There are plenty of problems with the NFL right now," I need to drop a link to "Sources: Jerry Richardson, Panthers Have Made Multiple Confidential Payouts for Workplace Misconduct, Including Sexual Harassment and Use of a Racial Slur" (Sports Illustrated) and "Diddy wants to buy the Panthers and sign Colin Kaepernick" (WaPo).

Thus Article "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."

That's an article "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rule-was-interpreted-correctly-but.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: