Title : Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future?
link : Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future?
Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future?
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Michael Peck, National Interest: The Navy's Next Super Weapon: 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers?
Opting for either of the large nuclear carriers described by RAND probably wouldn't result in too drastic a change for the Navy. Not so for the two smaller, conventionally-powered carriers. “The conventionally-powered alternatives we looked at—the two smallest variants—would, if selected as replacements for the Nimitz class as these ships reach service life, significantly impact Navy operational concepts,” Martin said. “This is primarily because they lack the ability to support an integrated air wing. They could generate some portion of the strike and defensive counter air sorties required in campaign plans, but they would have to rely on some off-ship alternative for other capabilities (airborne early warning and C2 in particular) now provided organically.”
The bottom line of a new study on U.S. aircraft carriers: you can't get something for nothing.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Apparently not.
Thus Article Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future?
That's an article Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/02/are-baby-aircraft-carriers-us-navys.html
0 Response to "Are 'Baby' Aircraft Carriers The U.S. Navy's Future?"
Post a Comment