Title : Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded.
link : Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded.
Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded.
Question for men.— Cathy Young (@CathyYoung63) February 1, 2018
Jordan Peterson said, in his interview w/Camille Paglia, that in any intellectual confrontation between men there's always an implicit option of settling things with fists; since it's not an option when arguing with a woman, men are at a disadvantage. Thoughts?
Take the poll before being influenced by my answer, revealed after the jump.
Here's the Jordan Peterson interview with Camille Paglia, in case you want to hear him explain his point before jumping to say it's "Totally nuts."
I said "a bit true/exaggerated" but considered "Absolutely true." I needed a choice between those 2 options. And I had already watched the interview, so I understood exactly what he meant.
Thus Article Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded.
That's an article Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded. This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded. with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/02/why-is-this-just-question-for-men-i.html
0 Response to "Why is this just a question for men? I answered this poll before noticing I was excluded."
Post a Comment