"Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."
link : "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

"Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

John Nichols, writing at The Nation, says "Scott Walker Is Trying To Dismantle Democracy in Wisconsin."

This legally-dubious attempt to overturn a judge’s order by writing a new law would radically alter rules that have been in place for decades—and in some cases more than a century—for holding prompt special elections. Yet, Republican legislative leaders plan to call an extraordinary special session April 4 to pass the legislation, and Walker says he will sign it immediately. Then, if the special elections have been called by the governor in order to a contempt of court ruling, Walker allies suggest, the governor will then cancel them....

What's the legal argument that the legislature can't change the statutory law after a court has interpreted it and said that it must be followed? It's not enough to just say "legally-dubious." What's the argument? It can't be that it would "radically alter rules that have been in place for decades" — legislation can change existing law even when the law is old. I can see saying you like the old law better and are arguing that it's a good container of the value "democracy," but — speaking of democracy — if the legislature has the votes to change the law, it can change it.

And "dismantle democracy" is awfully melodramatic. We have way too many election days in Wisconsin, and I think they produce low turnout, which means that fewer people get to decide. For example, we need to notice that next Tuesday is an election day. It's annoying to non-politicos to be rousted to the polls so frequently, but for those who do take the trouble, our votes have extra weight. Is that democratic?

Thus Article "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

That's an article "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/03/instead-of-following-order-to-call.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: