Loading...

Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?

Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination? - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?
link : Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?

Read too


Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?

Seen, just now, in a sidebar at Salon:



Of course, Salon wants to stoke its readers' loathing of Trump, but this one should backfire. It seems like the best combination for a political leader, because: 1. This person was able to acquire great wealth, and 2. He has systems in place to prevent waste, even in small things.

When it's not about Trump, the frugality of wealthy individuals is celebrated. Here's "The surprisingly frugal habits of 8 extremely wealthy people":
Warren Buffett, chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, still lives in the same home he bought for $31,500 in 1958....

Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, drives a manual-transmission Volkswagen hatchback....

Ingvar Kamprad, founder of IKEA, still flies economy and often rides the bus....

Judy Faulkner, founder of Epic Systems... has had only two cars in the past 15 years and has lived with her husband in the same Madison, Wisconsin, suburb for nearly three decades.
Then there's "10 of the Richest Cheapskates of All Time" at Money Magazine begins:
Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor, is known for his frugality, living in the same unostentatious Omaha home he bought in the 1950s.... The Buffett diet includes five Cokes a day, as well as Cheetos and potato chips.

Sam Walton, the late billionaire co-founder of Wal-Mart, also lived comfortably, but without all the showy toys he could easily have afforded. “Why do I drive a pickup truck?” he asked in his autobiography. “What am I supposed to haul my dogs around in, a Rolls-Royce?”
The article goes on to highlight actual stinginess, such as JFK — recipient of "a trust fund worth $170 million in today’s dollars" — allowing "his friends, flunkies, Secret Service agents, and even dates to pick up the tab wherever he went."


Thus Article Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?

That's an article Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/05/wouldnt-cheap-billionaire-be-best.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Wouldn't cheap + billionaire be the best combination?"

Post a Comment

Loading...