Loading...

Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"...

Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"... - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"..., We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"...
link : Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"...

Read too


Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"...

... so that the failure of a voter to send back a card to keep their registration active in fact "'has no tendency to reveal accurately whether the registered voter has changed residences'; it is an 'irrelevant factor' that 'shows nothing at all that is statutorily significant.'"

Wrote Justice Alito for the majority in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, released by the Supreme Court yesterday. The internal quotes are from the Breyer dissent. For more detail into this statutory interpretation case, here's Amy Howe at SCOTUSblog. I just wanted to call attention to that freewheeling belief about human nature that made it into Breyer's opinion. Ohio was sending cards to people who hadn't voted in 2 years and then purging them fro, the list of registered voters if they did not return the card or vote in the next 4 years. So 6 years of not voting would cause your registration to lapse unless you returned the card. Federal law prohibited removing voters for mere failure to vote, so that card was really important in the analysis.

Justice Breyer noted that of the 1.5 million cards sent out, 60,000 were sent back to say they have moved and 235,000 were sent back to say I'm still here. So more than 1,000,000 were not sent back. That's 13% of Ohio’s voting population. People just can't be moving at that rate, he says (without mentioning death).
[T]he streets of Ohio’s cities are not filled with moving vans; nor has Cleveland become the Nation’s residential moving companies’ headquarters. Thus, I think it fair to assume (because of the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail, confirmed strongly by the actual numbers in this record) the following: In respect to change of residence, the failure of more than 1 million Ohio voters to respond to forwardable notices (the vast majority of those sent) shows nothing at all that is statutorily significant.


Thus Article Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"...

That's an article Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"... This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"... with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/06/justice-breyer-apparently-took-judicial.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Justice Breyer "apparently" took "judicial notice" of "'the human tendency not to send back cards received in the mail'"..."

Post a Comment

Loading...