"Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s."
link : "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s."

"Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s."

"But it also now seems clear that Clinton won’t be able to avoid answering these questions in future public appearances, which may well make him less likely to want to make public appearances in the future. There is also a strong likelihood that Clinton, who has been a mainstay of Democratic National Conventions for decades, won’t be speaking in 2020 or deployed as a campaign surrogate this fall for the first time in a generation. Yet it’s also clear that another cohort of Democrats — especially those on the older, maler side — are uncomfortable with the direction Gillibrand is going.  That’s in part a disagreement about political tactics, with some seeing it as foolish for Democrats to try to hold themselves to a high standard of conduct when Republicans hold Trump to no standard at all. But it’s probably better to think of it as primarily a disagreement about substance and the still-ambiguous legacy of #MeToo. In one view, the story is essentially that hard-working investigative journalists revealed a handful of cases of spectacularly egregious malfeasance by a handful of prominent men — Roger Ailes and Harvey Weinstein, most obviously — and that’s all to the good..... In [that] former view, nothing in the Lewinsky story is particularly damning (though if you believe Broaddrick, that’s another matter)...."

Writes Matthew Yglesias (at Vox). The other view, the Kirsten Gillibrand view, wants the #MeToo movement to work "a sea change in attitudes, standards of behavior, and evaluation of public figures." In that view, whether you believe Broaddrick or not, "Clinton is exactly the type of person whose conduct deserves a new, much harsher look."

What do you want to happen with #MeToo?

I'm with Gillbrand. I want the sea change.

I want enough effect to cover Bill Clinton (without needing to believe Broaddrick).

Just hold the Harvey Weinsteins accountable for the past. Everyone else: try to behave a bit better.

The whole #MeToo movement is misguided.

 

pollcode.com free polls

Thus Article "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s."

That's an article "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "Of course, Democrats aren’t going to travel back in time to force Bill Clinton to resign in the late 1990s." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/06/of-course-democrats-arent-going-to.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: