"In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'" - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'"
link : "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'"

"In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'"

"It just requires thought, or even the effort to get out to the heartland and talk to people. When I’ve done that I’ve generally found Trump supporters to be agents rather than victims. They’ve not been seduced by 'populism.' They are not 'populists.' They have few illusions about the president. They think he’s a loose cannon, needy, narcissistic, erratic. They like the way he’s an outsider and 'tells it like it is.' They wanted disruption of what they saw as a rigged system; he delivers it, daily. Jan-Werner Muller, professor of politics at Princeton University, has written in The Guardian, 'The profile of supporters of populism obviously matters, but it is patronizing to reduce all they think and say to resentment, and explain the entire phenomenon as an inarticulate political expression of the Trumpenproletariat and its European equivalents.' For me, the key word here is 'patronizing.' Liberal contempt is rampant."

From "It’s Time to Depopularize ‘Populist’" by Roger Cohen (NYT).

I selected the quote you see above, but now I'm reading the comments at the NYT, and they seem to be fixated on something else:

It’s critical to distinguish between a nationalist xenophobe and a reasonable voter who has made the plausible choice that Trump was a better option than other candidates....

They're all "PLAUSIBLE!!!!?!!"

Thus Article "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'"

That's an article "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'" This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "In nearly every case, there is a better, more precise way to describe a current political phenomenon than the word 'populist.'" with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/07/in-nearly-every-case-there-is-better.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: