Loading...

"Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

"Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."
link : "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

Read too


"Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

"Thus, if your personality tends toward unsociability, you shouldn’t feel the need to change.... [A]s long as you have regular social contact, you are choosing solitude rather than being forced into it, you have at least a few good friends and your solitude is good for your well-being or productivity... feel free to de-clutter your social calendar. It’s psychologist-approved."

From "Why being a loner may be good for your health/We tend to decry being alone. But emerging research suggests some potential benefits to being a loner – including for our creativity, mental health and even leadership skills" (BBC).

Those are some onerous conditions after "[A]s long as" and before you can "feel free." I'm not really seeing a robust justification of "being a loner." If you're really the loner type, do you "have regular social contact" and "at least a few good friends"? "A few" in my book means more than 2, and "good friends" seems like a pretty high standard, as if you need substantially more than 3 friends to be psychologist-approved to "de-clutter your social calendar." Even that phrase "de-clutter your social calendar" seems ridiculous. It assumes you've got lots of social options and you just want to be free to decline some of them. This isn't a real loner we're talking about. It seems to be about people who take on far more social connection than than necessary and have had trouble admitting is crowding out something else that they'd prefer.


Thus Article "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

That's an article "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/08/nurturing-few-solid-relationships.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you.""

Post a Comment

Loading...