"Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."
link : "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

"Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

A headline, on a WaPo column by Fred Hiatt, just one of many things I'm seeing this morning as I try to find some inroad into the story of Jamal Khashoggi.

Now, as more and more evidence implicates Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in the reported murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi on Saudi diplomatic property in Istanbul, the equation has changed.

The "reported murder" is a strange way to say "suspected murder" or "alleged murder" and it makes me uneasy about fake news. The fact that something has been reported doesn't make it true unless journalism itself is a process that ensures truth. I remain confused.

Hiatt imagines a daughter asking "Daddy" about why he works for a murderer, which just seems like sententious blather. Hiatt goes on to paint Trump as unscrupulous and greedy, thinking only about the money we get from Saudi Arabia. The column is padded out with the moral struggled of the imagined "Daddy" and concludes "No matter what Saudi Arabia offered, could its supposed friendship be worth shrugging off the ensnaring and killing of a critic whose only offense was to tell the truth?"

I'm wary of the foreign policy as "friendship" rhetoric. I'm wary of test: Can Daddy explain it to his little girl? In this invented moral scenario, why are we using a parent and child and why have a male parent and a female child? I know you want to play on my heartstrings, but could you play something less babyish? Was Obama's foreign policy — say, with Iran or Syria — put through an explain-it-to-a-child test?

People criticize Trump as being a big child, but this criticism of Trump expects us all to think like children.

Thus Article "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

That's an article "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/10/will-you-work-for-murderer-thats.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: