Loading...

Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?

Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System? - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?
link : Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?

Read too


Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?

An S-400 "Triumf" antiaircraft missile system. © Kirill Kallinikov / Sputnik

CNBC: Russia is luring international arms buyers with a missile system that costs much less than models made by American companies

* Russia’s S-400, a mobile long-range surface-to-air missile system, costs approximately $500 million, whereas a Patriot Pac-2 battery costs $1 billion and a THAAD battery rings in at about $3 billion, according to people with first-hand knowledge of a U.S. intelligence assessment.
* Lockheed Martin makes the THAAD, or terminal high altitude area defense, system, while Raytheon makes the Patriot system.
* Nearly 13 countries have expressed interest in buying Russia’s S-400, a move that could trigger potential U.S. sanctions

WASHINGTON — The Russian S-400 missile system costs a fraction of rival platforms made by U.S. companies, one of the major reasons several countries are interested in dealing with the Kremlin despite the potential for blowback.

Russia’s S-400, a mobile long-range surface-to-air missile system, costs approximately $500 million, whereas a Patriot Pac-2 battery costs $1 billion and a THAAD battery rings in at about $3 billion, according to people with first-hand knowledge of a U.S. intelligence assessment.

Lockheed Martin makes the THAAD, or terminal high altitude area defense, system, while Raytheon makes the Patriot system.

Read more ....

Update: Russia Lures International Arms Buyers With Half-Priced, More Effective Missile System (Zero Hedge)

WNU Editor: Even with the threat of U.S. sanctions, there are still 13 major countries that want to buy the system. It looks like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon may need to re-examine their product and its costs.


Thus Article Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?

That's an article Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2018/11/is-russias-s-400-surface-to-air-missile.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Is Russia's S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile System At A Fraction Of The Cost Of U.S. Competitors A Better Missile System?"

Post a Comment

Loading...