New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question., We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.
link : New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

On February 20, 2005, I asked whether it's "party hardy" or "party hearty." The NYT had written "party hardy," and that was the first time I'd noticed the near homophones and the potential for either word to make sense — with a slight difference of meaning:

If you're trying to wish the person well in holding up to all that drinking, it's "hardy." If you want them to have a lot of rollicking fun, it's "hearty." If you're trying to say both, stick to the spoken word. If you're the NYT, and you mean to insult the catty, exclusionary state school girls, "hardy" actually is the better choice.

 I love when people comment on old posts, especially really old posts, and I was pleased to see that "Unknown" stopped by last night to contribute this:

Thus Article New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

That's an article New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-evidence-answering-14-year-old.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: