"Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..." - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'...", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."
link : "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."

"Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."

"If you think they are clueless, you can coach them... Clueless can become creepy very quickly if you don’t address it. If they are creepy, you have to act."

Said Pat Milligan, who advises companies about gender issues, quoted in "Another Side of #MeToo: Male Managers Fearful of Mentoring Women" (NYT). She's trying to overcome the problem the title refers to.

There's also this, from Marc Pritchard: "It’s not enough to stand by when toxic masculinity is on display. It’s not enough to stand by and say ‘that’s not me.’ You need to be a role model for the next generation.... We need something like Lean In circles for men."

The NYT identifies Pritchard as the chief brand officer for Procter & Gamble, but it doesn't mention that P&G owns Gillette and that Gillette just put out that strange commercial that actually uses the term "toxic masculinity."

Anyway, I think Milligan's triad might be helpful — clueless, creepy, or criminal. Not that it's easy to know and to perceive where these lines are.

"Toxic masculinity" is a problematic term for general use because it has 2 possible meanings, as I discussed a few days ago:

The okay meaning sees the adjective "toxic" in "toxic masculinity" like the adjective "red" in "red shoes." It identifies a subcategory — the shoes that are red (as opposed to all the many other shoes) and the masculinity that is toxic (as opposed to all the other masculinity).

The hateful meaning sees the adjective "toxic" in "toxic masculinity" like the adjective "beloved" in "beloved country." You're referring to one thing — one country or masculinity as a single concept — and you're branding it as "beloved" or "toxic."

I did a little survey that I think shows why the term should be avoided:

Thus Article "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."

That's an article "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..." with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2019/01/once-companies-have-identified-those.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: