Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force? - Hallo friendsINFO TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article economy, Article health, Article hobby, Article News, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force?
link : Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force?

Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force?

W78 warhead used on the Minuteman III., USAF

Warzone/The Drive: Updating America's Land-Based Ballistic Missile 'Nuclear Sponge' Is A $100B+ Waste

It's time to cut a leg off America's Cold War vintage nuclear triad and dramatically strengthen the far more relevant two that remain.

We hear a lot about "tough decisions" from Pentagon officials when it comes to procurement, even in a time of a significant defense spending boom, to the point that many of those statements seem eye-roll worthy and completely out of touch with just how much the U.S. spends on its massive national security apparatus. One of the biggest ticket initiatives currently on the Pentagon's books is the revitalization of America's nuclear deterrent, and for good reason. Selective modernization is needed, but instead of finding an efficient strategic balance that better suits the age in which we live, the Pentagon has gone with a 'kitchen sink approach,' which is wasteful, and above all else, a massive handout to defense contractors.

Read more ....

Update #1: New Nuclear Missiles’ Cost Estimate Changes Again (Defense One)
Update #2: The cost of a new ICBM is going up. Here’s why the US Air Force isn’t concerned. (Defense News)

WNU Editor: A debate on maintaining the U.S. nuclear triad is long overdue. But even with the high costs of modernizing its nuclear force, I predict nothing is going to change. And with the very real possibility of a nuclear arms race occurring with the end of the U.S. - Russia nuclear missile treaties, a probable boost in spending.

Thus Article Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force?

That's an article Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Should The U.S. Maintain Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force? with the link address https://infotodays1.blogspot.com/2019/04/should-us-maintain-its-land-based.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: